Monday, November 26, 2012

Adaptive Reuse Project - Foch Street Property


In order to help determine the best real estate development decision, a developer has asked for outside assistance in evaluating their project. As part of this analysis, I will review the site, regulatory, market and financial implications of the potential project. The property is located at 821-945 and 1001-1059 Foch Street in Fort Worth, Texas.





 The developer has asked that we evaluate the following specific questions:

-What property type should this be developed as?  Should it be mixed use?

-Should a building be demolished in order to create more parking to allow different property uses on site?

-Should development be mothballed?


Site Analysis

The Subject Property is comprised of three buildings totaling approximately 162,300 square feet. Basic building information as of 1/1/11 is as follows:

 
Building
SF
Purchased Date
Redeveloped Date
Leased
Rents
1
68,000
2001
2002
60%
$14.50/SF NNN
2
80,000
2004
N/A
0%
N/A
3
14,300
2004
2005
100%
$14.50/SF NNN
 
162,300
 
 
 
 

 The most important decision is related to the future of Building 2.  Building 2 is currently vacant and causing a cash flow problem for the owners. This building was originally built in 1948 and has not been renovated. There is 4300 square feet of office space in the southeast side, which is opposite of the road frontage on Foch Street and most likely less desirable for potential tenants.   

Evaluation of the condition of Building 2 should be conducted in order to estimate the remaining useful life of the structure. The building was constructed using cast in place concrete with a flat concrete roof. It was reported that the roof retains water, which could lead to leaks and escalating maintenance costs in the future. It is anticipated that there will continue to be capital costs associated with basic upkeep if the property is retained in the current condition. In addition, the dated look of the property will create a challenge when attempting to attract new tenants to fill the vacancy.
 

Market Analysis
The subject property is located west of Downtown Fort Worth, Texas between an area known as the Cultural District and the Downtown district. There are several shops, restaurants, bars, and other attractions within close proximity of the property. According to the website walkscore.com, the subject property is in a location that is ‘Very Walkable,’ indicating the surrounding area has a variety of amenities that can be easily reached on foot or through public transport. 
 
 
Retail and office projects are being completed and successfully leased up around the immediate area. Across W 7th Street to the East, Montgomery Plaza was recently redeveloped and now features several large and small national retailers, a variety of restaurants, and condos priced from $210,000 to $1.2 million.  Also, Cypress Equities recently completed a project that was leased to a variety of high quality tenants including a movie theater / restaurant and a local gym. In these projects, rent for retail space is averaging $30-45/SF NNN. Office rents are averaging $25-26/SF NNN for spaces larger than 100,000 SF. Rents at the subject property are currently averaging $14.50/SF NNN, so newer projects are attracting a significant rent premium.
 
                          nearby Montgomery Plaza redevelopment

My concern with retail development for the Subject Property is the possibility that the area may not be able to support additional new retail with all of the recently completed projects. The developer would have to look hard to determine if the area could absorb any additional space that might be added at the Subject Property.
 
According to the developer, there were around 800 multifamily units for sale or rent within walking distance to the Subject Property. Other multifamily projects in the area had leased up successfully. The mixed use property directly adjacent to the Subject Property included 345 apartments that leased up immediately upon completion. Rents were around $1.40 - $1.50 for new apartments, which is on the high end of multifamily rents in Fort Worth. With all of the new commercial and the close proximity to Fort Worth cultural centers and employment centers,  this seems like it would be an ideal multifamily development site.
 
Regulatory Analysis
The zoning for this property is listed as MU-2, which is ‘High-Intensity Mixed Use.’ This zoning designation is designed to encourage high density housing and to allow for a variety of other uses including various residential, commercial, and light industrial applications. The MU-2 zoning allows for more potential uses than virtually any zoning designation which allows for flexibility for the developer or a potential buyer. With the MU-2 designation, there are certain restrictions that need to be considered such as setbacks and height restrictions. However, these regulations don’t seem to be prohibitive when considering a variety of potential projects. It is important to note that multifamily properties that would exceed 5 stories or 60 feet need to have at least 10% commercial space included within the design. Current zoning allows for an unlimited number of units, as long as 10% of the overall space of the project is dedicated to mixed-use commercial, retail or light industrial purposes.

 
The surrounding area features several new developments which are generall zoned ‘PD - Planned Development.’ According to the City website, the ‘PD’ District is intended to provide for greater flexibility in the development of residential, commercial, industrial, and institutional uses. The PD is a useful tool for redevelopment by providing a method to ensure that new land uses and their external effects such as traffic, signage, and parking, are developed to minimize any potential negative effects on adjacent properties.


 
 
The zoning for the subject and surrounding properties is favorable for new development activities due to the flexibility allowed in the current designations. It seems clear that the City of Fort Worth is determined to turn this area into a non-traditional (in Texas) thriving residential and commercial district. Based upon the success of some of the early projects in the area, it seems like this area is poised for continued growth for a variety of uses.

Financial Analysis

Based upon the site, market, and regulatory reviews, I believe that the current highest-and-best use of the property would be as a predominantly multifamily property. The desirability of the site location, the overwhelming positive economics of the overall multifamily sector and the recent new commercial developments in the area make this site prime for multifamily development. There would likely be some element of mixed-uses incorporated into the plans because of the city zoning requirements. Also, Building 1 is performing well enough to maintain in place as is, assuming that Buildings 2 and 3 would be large enough to support a multifamily property that could achieve the economies of scale needed for the new development.
 
 There are two possible routes for adding new multifamily development: adding a brand new structure or adaptively reusing the current buildings. Although it could create a very interesting finished product, my estimation is that adaptive reuse of the current building would be prohibitively expensive. Not only would the developer need to spend a lot of money to add all necessary fixtures to make the space suitable for residents, they’d also need to repair any ongoing capital issues such as the roof and exterior appearance. Also, adaptive reuse would only allow for one level of apartments to be added, whereas a new development could be built with several stories of rental units. Building 2 currently has 80,000 square feet of space, which after adjusting for needed common areas in a residential space, could probably support no more than 80 housing units depending on the size of the units.
 
 In my opinion, the best use of the site would be for a new multifamily development. The land on which Building 2 is located is listed as 2.8260 acres or 123,101 square feet on the TCAD website. The land on which Building 3 is located is listed as 3.533 acres or 153,903 square feet on the TCAD website. According to the current zoning laws, there is no limit as to how many units could be added to the property as long as ‘the project includes office, eating and entertainment, and/or retail sales and service uses that constitute at least 10 percent of the gross floor area.’ On the site of Building 2 alone, it is estimated that a developer could install at least 300 multifamily units by building a dense 4 or more story building design.
 
Construction costs for a property of this design would likely be expensive, as in the range of $100,000 per unit or more. According to the RS Means Construction Estimating site, a developer could expect to spend around $101 per square foot for the property, assuming Concrete Block and Steel construction of a six story building.


 
 
If the developer was unable to secure equity or debt for a project of this magnitude, it is likely that the property could be sold to accommodate a different multifamily developer that is interested in developing in Fort Worth. With land trading at $30/SF or more, the Building 2 land alone could earn nearly $4 million, with the larger tract of Buildings 2 and 3 earning between $8.25 and 9 million from a multifamily developer. Multifamily development is heating up, as the economics of development appear to be favorable for the foreseeable future due to tighter lending standards, population growth in Fort Worth, and a larger number of people choosing to rent in urban areas instead of attempting to purchase a home.

Summary

 There are a number of uses that could be considered for the Subject Property on Foch Street. Here are my recommendations:
-         Building 1: Since Building 1 is performing and has what seems to be a consistent and desirable tenant base, I would recommend allowing this property to continuing operating in its current condition. At some point in the future, it may be necessary to renovate the property to attract higher rents and compete with new retail developments in the area.  
-         Building 2: Since repair and renovation costs will continue to be a drain on cash flow, a major change is needed. The property could be effectively used for multifamily rentals. It’s possible that Building 2 could be adaptively reused for multifamily loft-style rental space, but it’s more likely the space could be effectively used if demolished and rebuilt. Rebuilding would allow for more sustainable, higher-density, multi-level multifamily rentals. It’s anticipated that the property would lease up quickly at rates above $1.50 due to the desirability of the area and the favorable multifamily economics. If the developer was unable to undertake a project of this magnitude, the property should be marketed for sale to another multifamily developer.
-         Building 3: Since this property is performing, this building should be allowed to perform in its current condition unless the land was needed for the multifamily development project on the site of Building 2 or if it could be packaged for sale with Building 2.
 
 
Sources
Developer feedback
RS Means Construction Estimating website - www.reedconstructiondata.com/rsmeans
City of Fort Worth Zoning commission
Texas A&M Real Estate Center
Downtown Fort Worth, Inc.
 
 
 
 

 

Tuesday, November 20, 2012

Adaptive Reuse Topic: Transit Oriented Development

Adaptive Reuse Topic: Transit Oriented Development

Wikipedia article: Transit Oriented Development - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transit-oriented_development

This wikipedia article gives a basic definition of transit oriented development and offers several real life exaple of TOD in cities. TODs are generally mixed use and encourage use of public transport. The center of the TOD is generally the transit stop, with high density real estate surrounding the center. Cities listed with good examples of TOD include San Francisco, Vancouver, and Portland.

Website: Dallas County Economic Development TOD page - http://www.dallas-ecodev.org/redevelopment/tod/

This website shows the City of Dallas' current attempt to encourage TOD in preparation for massive population growth. The site lists several TODs in the Dallas area that offer citizens the opportunity to work, shop and live within close proximity to public transport. Unfortunately, TOD has a long way to go in Dallas.

Article: Dallas’ Mockingbird Station project laid the tracks for future transit oriented developments -  http://bizbeatblog.dallasnews.com/2012/09/mockingbird-station-laid-the-tracks-for-future-transit-oriented-developments.html/

This article discusses the history of Dallas' Mockingbird Station, which was the city's first TOD. This project took advantage of the new DART lines that were installed through North Dallas. After a decade, DART is relevant but not used by the masses.

Adaptive Reuse Topic: Pedestrian Oriented Development

Adaptive Reuse Topic: Pedestrian Oriented Development

Article: The 13 points of Pedestrian Oriented Development - http://www.cooltownstudios.com/2005/05/03/the-13-points-of-pedestrian-oriented-development/

This article discusses the author's opinion of what makes a successful pedestrian oriented development. The most interesting points on this list to me are that there is a transportation hub at the center of the neighborhood, that the houses front the street instead of parking lots or garage doors, and that the development has a discernible center.

Website: City of Leander TOD - http://www.leandertx.org/page.php?page_id=39

The City of Leander website outlines their Transit Oriented Development, which dates back to 2004 and won several awards once completed. The TOD has a 'Smart Code' in place which, according to the website, "is based upon New Urbanism principals designed to create traditional pedestrian-oriented communities with neighborhoods and town centers with a mix and integration of residential, commercial and retail uses."

Website: Congress of New Urbanism - http://www.cnu.org/

The Congress of New Urbanism website is dedicated to 'promoting walkable, mixed-use neighborhood development, sustainable communities and healthier living conditions.' This organization attempts to influence development decisions on communities are developed. The main goals of the organization are:
  • Livable streets arranged in compact, walkable blocks.
  • A range of housing choices to serve people of diverse ages and income levels.
  • Schools, stores and other nearby destinations reachable by walking, bicycling or transit service.
  • An affirming, human-scaled public realm where appropriately designed buildings define and enliven streets and other public spaces.

  • An interesting slideshow pertaining to the CNU is shown here:
    http://issuu.com/newurbanism/docs/new_urbanism_intro/17

    Monday, November 19, 2012

    Adaptive Reuse Topic: Building Code in Relation to Adaptive Reuse

    Adaptive Reuse Topic: Building Code in Relation to Adaptive Reuse

    Article: A Toolbox for Adaptive Reuse - http://www.insightarch.com/Adaptive%20Reuse%20Toolbox.pdf

    This article discusses some of the challenges facing developers who wish to adaptively reuse older buildings. Typically, there are several issues that need to be considered by the developers, including potential environmental, accessability, or structural issues.

    Article: Adaptive Reuse of Existing Structures - http://www.structuremag.org/article.aspx?articleID=461

    This article discusses a successful program that encouraged resue of older buildings in the Los Angeles downtown area to be used as residential units. Developers and the City had to work together to get these buildings up to code for seismic, as these codes have changed tremendously since the original construction.

    Article: Livestrong Headquarters - http://adaptivereuse.info/tag/texas/

    This article discusses the Livestrong Headquarters that is in Austin and used by Lance Armstrong's foundation. The facility was adaptively reused by the organization and was restored to a LEED Gold level

    Sunday, November 18, 2012

    Adaptive Reuse Topic: Superfund and Brownfield Grants

    Adaptive Reuse Topic: Superfund and Brownfield Grants

    Website: Region 6 Brownfields Program - http://www.epa.gov/region6/6sf/brownfields/index.html

    This website is the EPA official site serving Texas and several adjacent states. This site gives information about programs that are available in this area and training opportunities for interested parties. Also, the site gives an example of a successful Brownfield cleanup project in Oklahoma.

    Article: Brownfield to Greenfield - Victory Park - http://www.epa.gov/region6/6sf/pdffiles/victoryparksuccess2007.pdf

    This article discusses the story of Victory Park in Dallas and how this site was converted from an old power plant to a mixed-use entertainment district. The total cost of the cleanup was over $12 million, which was paid through a public-private partnership with the City of Dallas.

    Article: A Guide to Superfund and Brownfield Site Cleanup Opportunities -  http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=superfund%20and%20brownfield%20grants&source=web&cd=2&ved=0CDgQFjAB&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.gillibrand.senate.gov%2Fdownload%2Fgillibrand-brownfields-and-superfund-cleanup-funding-opportunities-guidebook-2012&ei=34OpUMTjKJTHqAGU_YDABw&usg=AFQjCNFPWqqHX_iTZCOMknzskdMjD5pO0A

    This article that was published by a Senator in New York discusses the available grants that can be used in that state. The article differentiates between a brownfield site and a more complex Superfund site. The grants can cover a variety of areas, including assessments, training and actual cleanups.

    Adaptive Reuse Topic: Tax Increment Financing

    Adaptive Reuse Topic: Tax Increment Financing

    Wikipedia Definition: Tax Increment Financing - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tax_increment_financing

    This wikipedia definition covers Tax Increment Financing history and common applications. TIFs are used to finance redevelopment. TIFs use projected future gains in taxes to subsidize current projects. TIFs began in California in 1952 and constitute over $10 billion in revenue for that state. Some criticize TIFs by claiming that these incentives don't actually benefit residents of an area and instead create tax inflation and gentrification.

    Article: Fort Worth Avenue TIF District Plan - http://www.dallas-ecodev.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/FortWorthAvenue_plan.pdf

    This plan for the Fort Worth Avenue area of Dallas shows the City's plan for this area of Dallas that is just east of downtown. I am currently in the process of moving to the area, so this plan is important to me. The City would like to make improvements to several components of the area to attract more single family development, encourage retail development, and increase the tax base.

    Article: Sylvan Thirty gets TIF extension - http://cityhallblog.dallasnews.com/2012/06/sylvan-thirty-gets-city-deadline-extension-groundbreaking-pushed-back-to-later-this-summer.html/

    This article discusses a property that was attempting to get up to $3M in financing from the Fort Worth Avenue TIF district that is mentioned above. This mixed use property would be instrumental in improving the Fort Worth Avenue area.

    Adaptive Reuse Topic: Mortgage Guarantee Programs (through HUD)

    Adaptive Reuse Topic: Mortgage Guarantee Programs (through HUD)

    Article: FHA Bailout Risk Looming -  http://www.businessweek.com/news/2012-03-27/fha-bailout-risk-looming-larger-after-guarantee-binge-mortgages

    This article discusses the risk of bailout that may have been needed for the FHA after the economic downturn and real estate crisis of the late 2000's. The FHA guarantees up to $1.1. trillion in home loans, many of which were impacted by the economic downturn.

    Wikipedia Definition: FHA Insured Loan - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FHA_insured_loan

    This wikipedia article explains FHA Insured Loans and their usage. FHA Insured Loans were developed after the Great Depression and still utilized today. The FHA doesn't make loans, but instead guarantees loans made by private lenders. There are mortgage grants available to help cover initial down payments.

    Article: FHA Mortgage Limits - http://www.fha.com/lending_limits_state.cfm?state=TEXAS

    This non-governmental site shows the current FHA mortgage loan limits for a variety of cities in the US. The limit in Dallas for a one-unit property is $271,050. You can take out a loan for up to a four unit property for up to $521,050. For reference, you can get a loan in San Francisco County for up to $729,750. The down payment can typically be less than 5% with FHA loans.

    Adaptive Reuse Topic: Community Development Block Grant

    Adaptive Reuse Topic: Community Development Block Grant

    Site: HUD Community Development Block Grant -  http://portal.hud.gov/hudportal/HUD?src=/program_offices/comm_planning/communitydevelopment/programs

    This site is the landing page for the HUD Development program. This site has links to all elements of the CDBG program, which is intended to benefit low to moderate income residents through a variety of different programs.

    Site: Dallas County CDBG Program - http://www.dallascounty.org/department/plandev/cdbg.php

    This site is the local Dallas County information pertaining to the CDBG program. The County receives about $2.3 million from HUD that is used to eradicate blight for low to moderate income individuals. The County is able to operate a Loan Counseling Center and allocate money to local area programs.

    Site: Dallas County Loun Counseling Center - http://www.dallascounty.org/department/hhs/homeloan.html

    As part of the HUD Grant for Community Development, the County operates a Home Loan Counseling Center that is dedicated to increasing homeownership amongst the County's low to moderate income citizens.

    Sunday, November 11, 2012

    Adaptive Reuse topic: Low Income Housing Tax Credits

    Adaptive Reuse topic: Low Income Housing Tax Credits

    Article: LIHTC Basics
    http://portal.hud.gov/hudportal/HUD?src=/program_offices/comm_planning/affordablehousing/training/web/lihtc/basics

    This article on the HUD website gives an overview of LIHTC credits, eligibility requirements, how the credits work, and some issues related to selling of credits earned. Credits are awarded on a competitive basis and rental properties are required to maintain a certain number of apartments that are rented to low-income residents.

    Article: Affordable Housing through Historic Preservation - Case Study
    http://www.nps.gov/tps/tax-incentives/taxdocs/Affordable-Housing-Van-Allen.pdf

    The case study details an example of how LIHTC incentives can be combined with historic preservation credits and other grants. This project in small town Iowa was almost able to avoid debt financing altogether by utilizing grants, tax credits and a non-profit equity fund. The developers raised over $1.4 million in equity by utilizing historic tax credits and LIHTC.

    Article: Overview of the Low Income Housing Tax Credit Program (LIHTC)
    http://nhlp.org/lihtcoverview

    This article gives an overview of rhe LIHTC program with links to other resources about the Qualified Allocation Plan, LIHTC ownership, and LIHTC preservation.

    Adaptive Reuse Topic: Rehabilitation Tax Credit

    Adaptive Reuse Topic: Rehabilitation Tax Credit

    Article: Historic Preservation Tax Credit Program for City of Dallas
    http://www.dallascityhall.com/development_services/pdf/TaxIncentiveInformationPacket.pdf

    This document that was published by the City of Dallas shows the rules and process associated with receiving tax credits as an incentive for restoring historic properties. The incentive only applies to certain areas within Dallas and the credit applies to city property tax only.

    Website: Federal Tax Credits - Texas Historical Commission
    http://www.thc.state.tx.us/historicprop/hpcredits.shtml
    This link to the Texas Historical Commission website shows some basic information related to federal tax credits for rehabilitation of properties that can be shown on the National Register of Historic Places. This credit is only available for income-producing properties, so single family properties are not eligible. This credit is for large projects only as the cost of the rehabiliation must exceed the value of the property prior to the rehab.

    Article: The Valley Fruit Company: A Tax Credit Rehabilitation Project
    http://www.thc.state.tx.us/historicprop/hpcredits_vfruit.shtml
    This case study that is shown on the Texas Historical Commission website shows an example of how the rehabiliation tax credit can be used. This owner was successful in achieving a 20% tax credit due to the nature of the project that they completed.

    Adaptive Reuse Topic - Community Development Entity

    Adaptive Reuse Topic - Community Development Entity

    Website: Community Development Financial Institution (wikipedia)
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Community_development_financial_institution

    This link leads to a general user-generated definition of a Community Development Financial Institution. In the article, a CDFI is defined as 'a financial institution that: has a primary mission of community development, serves a target market, is a financing entity, provides development services, remains accountable to its community, and is a non-governmental entity.' The article then lists several different examples of CDFI's.

    Website: CARS Ratings system for CDFI Ratings
    http://carsratingsystem.net/default.asp

    This website is a link to a rating system that rates different CDFI programs. There is a searchable database that shows different rated CDFI's in a selected area and allows for purchase of a complete rating of that CDFI. This could be helpful for investors seeking a reputable CDFI to work with.

    Article: The New Markets Tax Credit: The "Forgotten" Incentive
    http://www.areadevelopment.com/taxesIncentives/dec09/new-markets-tax-credit-incentive1103.shtml?Page=1

    This article discusses the use of CDE's and the New Market Tax Credit program. There are two case studies that show use of the NMTC program in order to get a development project underway. In order to use a NMTC through a CDE, the project needs to fall in a low income community and meet other specific criteria.

    Tuesday, October 23, 2012

    Adaptive Reuse Topic - New Market Tax Credit

    Adaptive Reuse Topic - New Market Tax Credit

    YouTube Video - New Market Tax Credit (NMTC) Basic Overview

    This video provides a basic outline of new market tax credits (NMTC). In the video, they cover the which agency of the federal government provides the tax credits and how they can be functionally applied.

    Website - New Market Tax Credit Dallas
    http://www.dallas-ecodev.org/incentives/new-markets-tax-credit/

    This website reinforces some of the information that is discussed in the video and gives more specific information as it applies to the City of Dallas. On the map, they show which areas of town qualify as distressed and could potentially enroll in the program.. The Fort Worth Avenue area where I am considering relocating to is considered a distressed area of town and could potentially be eligible for this program. There is also a checklist that shows the specific criteria for consideration for City tax credits.

    Case Study - Clearinghouse CDFI
    http://www.frbsf.org/publications/community/review/122005/article5.pdf

    This article provides a great case study of how the NMTC can actually be utilized. This firm has been successful in using these tax credits and they offer some advice in the case study of keeping the project simple, showing a track record of equity generation, and making sure the project is contributing to the local community.

    Adaptive Reuse Topic - Historic Preservation Credits

    Adaptive Reuse Topic - Historic Preservation Credits

    YouTube video: Historic Preservation Tax Credits


    I thought this was a good overview of Historic Tax Preservation Credits. It did not provide a lot of detail so I'll need to find that information elsewhere. They repeatedly gave the advice to use a consultant or expert, which I agreed with for beginners. The video mentioned state and local incentives, which I will explore further in the following article about the City of Dallas credits.

    Article: Historic Preservation Tax Incentive Program - City of Dallas
    http://dallascityhall.com/development_services/pdf/TaxIncentiveInformationPacket.pdf

    This is the official document from the City of Dallas that discusses incentives for developers and owner who meet certain criteria to earn tax credits by improving historic buildings in the City of Dallas. It's important to note that this is totally different than the Federal Tax Credits listed above and these incentives apply only to City taxes. If one of was knowledgable in historic tax credits, it seems feasible that they could concurrently take advantage of several differnt programs that incentivize historic preservation.

    Article: An Overview of Opportunities in the the Federal Historic Preservation Tax Credits Program
    https://www.americanbar.org/newsletter/publications/law_trends_news_practice_area_e_newsletter_home/preservationtaxcred.html

    This law blog publication goes over some of the finer points of the preservation tax credit rules. For example, it explains that the owner must be entitled for five years after claiming the tax credits. Also, it explains that all tax credits must be for properties that are income producing/
     

    Sunday, August 5, 2012


    J Garcia Realty, LLC



    Building Acquisition



    Final Investment Memo




    Briarcliff Manor

    425 N. Rosemount

    Dallas, TX 75208



    Briarcliff Manor Apartments

    425 N. Rosemont, Dallas, TX 75208


    PROPOSED TRANSACTION

    Proposal is to acquire a 23-unit, 17,385 square foot multifamily property in Dallas, TX for a total acquisition cost of $750,000 requiring an initial investor contribution of $250,000. Investment analysis suggests Unleveraged Internal Rate of Return of 8.56% and Leveraged Internal Rate of Return of 15.23% over an assumed five year holding period.

    EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

    J Garcia Realty, LLC would like to purchase a 23-unit multifamily property in the North Oak Cliff neighborhood of Dallas, TX for a total asking price of $750,000. After acquisition costs and including $30,000 of necessary renovation capital, the total acquisition basis would be $795,000. At the $750,000 acquisition price, the entry cap rate would be 7.84% based upon the estimated Year 1 NOI. With successful implementation of the Business Plan, analysis suggests Unleveraged Internal Rate of Return of 8.56% and Leveraged Internal Rate of Return of 15.23% over an assumed five year holding period.

    Built in early 1960’s in the revitalized North Oak Cliff neighborhood of Dallas, the property offers 17,385 of rentable square feet spread between five different one and two bedroom floorplans. The property currently offers large floorplans and rent rates that are at or below current market rates. With basic property improvements performed at acquisition and improved management processes, it is estimated that the property resident base and average rental rates would be improved over time. Additional improvement projects would be considered throughout the holding period if any adequate return on investment could be realized.

    The property is located within North Oak Cliff and in close proximity to the Bishop Arts District and Winnetka Heights. The Bishop Arts area has recently revitalized with desirable high-density retail and entertainment being added to the area. As of now, an extensive market observation and a formal market survey indicates that there is a lack of desirable housing in the area so many of the visitors travel in from other areas. New residential developments are starting to spring up in the area, including a new 207-unit luxury community immediately adjacent to Briarcliff Manor. In order to continue to improve into a high-profile commercial center with a variety of shopping and dining options, more acceptable housing options will need to be added and Briarcliff Manor will be well-positioned to capture the influx of new residents.


    KEY REASONS FOR INVESTMENT


    -       First-mover advantage into redeveloping market – Many new commercial projects have sprung up in the Bishop Arts District, but the area is noticeably lacking acceptable residential options. City of Dallas presentations show that development of North Oak Cliff is a key city imitative. New residential developments are in their early stages but will not be ready for new residents for 12 months or more.


    -       Rent growth potential with basic improvements – Analysis shows favorable returns are probable without significant rent growth, but market analysis shows a significant rent upside with basic improvements. Acquisition capital would be deployed to improve property signage, exterior appeal, and landscaping. Future improvements would be considered if they are able to reach a desired return on investment.


    -       Property Management improvement potential – The property is currently being managed by a resident. J Garcia Realty, LLC was founded by an experienced residential property management professional who could utilize his professional experience on this property. 


    -       Desirable cap rate compared with other properties in today’s multifamily seller’s market – Smaller and older properties are not typically targeted by many institutional investors who are seeking a much higher return. Larger core multifamily properties are trading at sub-5% cap rates in today’s market while this property is being offered at a 7.84% cap. J Garcia Realty Investors LLC operates with a lower overhead and is able to invest in projects that other larger firms are unable to consider.


    KEY ACQUISITION RISKS  


    -       Property Condition and Maintenance – With the property being built in the early 1960’s, maintenance issues will need to be dealt with professionally and efficiently. In order to predict upcoming potential maintenance issues, a full property inspection with an industry expert will be conducted.  The system operates with a 2 pipe chiller unit which is costly to replace.

    -       ‘All Bills Paid’ utility structure – The current utility payment structure puts the landlord at risk if utility prices increase dramatically. Investigation would be done to determine the process that would be required in order to change to a system where residents pay utilities directly.


    MARKET OVERVIEW

    The Dallas / Fort Worth area and the associated rental demand are expected to grow in population tremendously over the next 30 years. According to the Real Estate Center at Texas A&M University, the population of Dallas is forecast to increase by 38% between 2010 and 2030. The projected population in 2040 is 10.1 million people, compared with a current population of around 6.3 million people. Much of the growth in the area has occurred in suburbs to the north of Dallas, but new focus has turned from residents and City Hall to promote growth in urban in-fill locations that have previously fallen on hard times. North Oak Cliff and the Bishop Arts area are well-positioned to benefit from the urban redevelopment trend.


    North Oak Cliff Area
    **Courtesy of Offering Memo


    Many Dallas area residents are beginning to appreciate the commercial benefits of North Oak Cliff and the Bishop Arts, but there is a noticeable lack of acceptable residential choices for potential renters in the area. Many of the local competitors accept Section 8 vouchers, which can deter non-assisted housing residents. Other competitors lack present-day standards for an apartment community like desirable curb appeal or a basic website and online marketing presence. Still other competitors are tightly bunched in areas west and northwest of Briarcliff Manor and have no chance to capitalize on the improvements in the Bishop Arts area. In general, for a variety of reasons there aren’t a significant amount of current competitors that would restrict the growth and improvement of Briarcliff Manor


                   Area Map




     
    A basic market survey shows immediate rent growth potential. Briarcliff Manor is currently offering an ‘All Utilities Paid’ structure for similar rents to competing properties. If reasonably possible, management would plan to transition away from the ‘All Utilities Paid’ structure without sacrificing rent. Although some residents may depart, many will shop around to find that there is a lack of acceptable rental options in Briarcliff Manor’s general price range. New developments are planned in the area including Wood Partners’ new 207-unit luxury community immediately adjacent to Briarcliff Manor, although that development should not be considered a threat because the anticipated rents will be beyond what our current resident base would be willing to pay. Instead, we expect to gain residents once the new development is completed as more residents are attracted to the area but don’t want to pay luxury community rents.

    1 Bedroom Basic Market Survey

    Property
    SF
    Rent
    Rent / SF
    Utilities
    Briarcliff Manor
    615
    $625
    1.02
    included
    Country Greens
    650
    $705
    1.08
    not included
    Casa Trevino
    650
    $600
    0.92
    not included
    Oakwood
    640
    $725
    1.13
    not included
    Oakwood
    730
    $725
    0.99
    not included
    Cantera Crossing
    615
    $535
    0.87
    not included
    Cantera Crossing
    705
    $559
    0.79
    not included
    657.86
    $639
    0.97

    2 Bedroom Basic Market Survey

    Property
    SF
    Rent
    Rent / SF
    Utilities
    Briarcliff Manor
    780
    $725
    0.93
    included
    Briarcliff Manor
    840
    $725
    0.86
    included
    Briarcliff Manor
    945
    $725
    0.77
    included
    Country Greens
    725
    $725
    1.00
    not included
    Oakwood
    890
    $848
    0.95
    not included
    Oakwood
    955
    $848
    0.89
    not included
    Cantera Crossing
    850
    $699
    0.82
    not included
    Cantera Crossing
    1035
    $699
    0.68
    not included
    877.5
    $749
    0.86

                  Competitor Map



    FINANCIAL ANALYSIS



    According to underwriting, unleveraged returns of 8.56% and leveraged returns of 15.23% are possible over an assumed five year holding period.

    U-IRR: 8.56%

    L-IRR: 15.23%

    NOI - Year 1: $58,303 or $2557 per unit

    Annual Debt Service – Year 1: $35,108 or $1526 per unit

    Cash Flow - Year 1: $18,895 or $822 per unit

    Net Rental Yield – Year 1: 7.84%

    Cash on Cash Rental Yield – Year 1: 7.558%



    Key underwriting assumptions are as follows:

    Acquisition Price: $750,000

    Renovation Expense: $30,000

    Entry Cap Rate: 7.84% - based upon estimated year 1 NOI

    Exit Cap Rate: 7.84% - kept constant in underwriting to be conservative

    LTV: 72.67%

    Amortization Period: 30 years

    Interest Rate: 5% - based upon market interest rate research.

    Assumed Vacancy: 5% - based upon market research for Dallas area

    Rent Growth Rate: 3% - industry standard growth assumption

    Expense Growth Rate: 2% - industry standard growth assumption

    Closing Costs: 2.5%


    Asset Underwriting















     
    EXIT STRATEGY

    Financial underwriting was completed with an assumed five year holding period however the actual hold time could vary based upon market conditions and investor needs. Exit cap rate was assumed to be the same as the initial cap rate for comparison purposes, although some cap rate change would be expected throughout the holding period. Instead of relying solely on cap rate improvement in order to make this investment successful, the focus during the holding period would be to improve NOI by upgrading the property, increasing rents as the area improves, and improving management efficiencies. Focusing on NOI improvement will be the key to maximizing sale value at the appropriate time.




    EXHIBITS

    Property Pictures

    Market Survey

    Works Cited

    Full Underwriting – separate attachment








    Works Cited / Resources



    -       Offering Memo from JP Lumbley & Associates LLC (attached)

    -       Texas Real Estate Center

    -       Loopnet.com

    -       Apartmentratings.com

    -       Apartmentguide.com

    -       Dallas Central Appraisal District

    -       Wood Partners’ general website